<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Expose the Left</title>
	<link>http://www.exposetheleft.com</link>
	<description>Monitoring and exposing liberal bias in the media and partisan politics on the left.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 20:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Back</title>
		<link>http://www.exposetheleft.com/2007/06/02/back-6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exposetheleft.com/2007/06/02/back-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 20:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exposetheleft.com/2007/06/02/back-6/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	I&#8217;m currently blogging at Ian Schwartz.com for the time being.
 ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m currently blogging at <a href="http://IanSchwartz.com">Ian Schwartz.com</a> for the time being.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exposetheleft.com/2007/06/02/back-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Electionblogging: Lieberman vs. Lamont, Johnson vs. McKinney</title>
		<link>http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/08/electionblogging-lieberman-vs-lamont-johnson-vs-mckinney/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/08/electionblogging-lieberman-vs-lamont-johnson-vs-mckinney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 19:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Election News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/08/electionblogging-lieberman-vs-lamont-johnson-vs-mckinney/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Open thread for discussion at Hot Air.
 ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/top-picks/2006/08/08/electionblogging-lieberman-vs-lamont/">Open thread for discussion at Hot Air</a>.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/08/electionblogging-lieberman-vs-lamont-johnson-vs-mckinney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moving</title>
		<link>http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/07/moving/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/07/moving/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 07:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/07/moving/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	

	I&#8217;m excited to publish that I now will be working at Hot Air, the cool alternative to the liberal establishment.  I do not want to bore you with a long list of thanks, shoutouts, and what not, but I would like to express my admiration for everyone who made Expose the Left what it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><center><a href="http://hotair.com/"><img src="http://www.exposetheleft.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/08/hotair.gif" alt="" /></a></center></p>

	<p>I&#8217;m excited to publish that I now will be working at <a href="http://www.hotair.com">Hot Air</a>, the cool alternative to the liberal establishment.  I do not want to bore you with a long list of thanks, shoutouts, and what not, but I would like to express my admiration for everyone who made Expose the Left what it was.</p>

	<p>So, please come and join me at <a href="http://www.hotair.com">Hot Air</a>, where I will be exposing liberal media bias and left-wing kooks.</p>

	<p>Expose the Left will not cease to exist, however as noted above, I will not be updating in the foreseeable future.  For the next 10 days you be able to access Expose the Left as you normally have. Beginning August 17th, the archives of Expose the Left will be accessed through a different link than it is now. For the time being I have decided to keep videos open to the public for your viewing pleasure.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/07/moving/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parish Has Simple Message For ACLU</title>
		<link>http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/06/parish-has-simple-message-for-aclu/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/06/parish-has-simple-message-for-aclu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 15:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/06/parish-has-simple-message-for-aclu/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Via: The Times-Picayune

	Alarmed by newspaper reports that a hurricane memorial in St. Bernard Parish will feature a cross bearing a likeness of the face of Jesus, the American Civil Liberties Union of Louisiana is reminding parish officials of the Constitution&#8217;s separation of church and state.

	Never one to back down, Parish President Henry &#8220;Junior&#8221; Rodriguez has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Via: <a href="http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/metro/index.ssf?/base/news-16/1154844074102520.xml&#38;coll=1" target="_blank">The Times-Picayune</a></p>

	<p><blockquote>Alarmed by newspaper reports that a hurricane memorial in St. Bernard Parish will feature a cross bearing a likeness of the face of Jesus, the American Civil Liberties Union of Louisiana is reminding parish officials of the Constitution&#8217;s separation of church and state.</p>

	<p>Never one to back down, Parish President Henry &#8220;Junior&#8221; Rodriguez has a simple reply: &#8220;They can kiss my ass.&#8221;</blockquote></p>

	<p>Read all about the <span class="caps">ACLU</span>&#8217;s attempt to get rid of this memorial <a href="http://stoptheaclu.com/archives/2006/08/06/aclu-wants-parish-to-nix-katrina-memorial-cross-plan/">being built from donations by volunteers on private land.</a></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/06/parish-has-simple-message-for-aclu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McKinney Vs. Johnson - Rounds #2, 3, 4 &#038; 5 (VIDEOS)</title>
		<link>http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/06/mckinney-vs-johnson-rounds-2-3-4-5-videos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/06/mckinney-vs-johnson-rounds-2-3-4-5-videos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 08:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MsUnderestimated</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Idiot of the Day]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Whining]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/06/mckinney-vs-johnson-rounds-2-3-4-5-videos/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Cross-posted by MsUnderestimated.

	This has to be what can only be deemed as rounds #2, 3, 4 &#38; 5 of the WWF of the political world. Cynthia is trying so hard to keep her belt, but it&#8217;s getting harder and harder. However, I wasn&#8217;t sure Hank was going to make it. Was he coughing to disrupt [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong><em>Cross-posted by MsUnderestimated.</em></strong></p>

	<p>This has to be what can only be deemed as rounds #2, 3, 4 &#38; 5 of the <span class="caps">WWF</span> of the political world. Cynthia is trying so hard to keep her belt, but it&#8217;s getting harder and harder. However, I wasn&#8217;t sure Hank was going to make it. Was he coughing to disrupt the cutest little jihadist in Congress as she spewed her blather from the inside of the skull-tightening braids on her head? Or did her hot air scorch the air around them both so bad that he couldn&#8217;t breathe? Don&#8217;t know. Neither one impressed me very much, but even as his incompetence is so profoundly displayed, the &#8220;lesser of two evils&#8221; argument needs to be thrown out of the window this time.</p>

	<p><center><img src="http://msunderestimated.com/McKinneyVJohnsonDebate0812.jpg" alt="" /></center></p>

	<p>I don&#8217;t live in that district, but what I wouldn&#8217;t give to live there for just one day <del datetime="2006-08-06T22:23:40+00:00">next Tuesday</del> in November to vote for the Republican &#8211; whomever he/she may be &#8211; to keep either of these less-than-brainiacs out of the Georgia Congress. That being said, Georgia&#8217;s 4th District is and always has been Democratically controlled. Given that, I hope that the voters of that district &#8220;get out the vote&#8221; next Tuesday for Hank Johnson. Hank doesn&#8217;t look like someone who would smack a police officer who was just doing his job on Capitol Hill.</p>

	<p>For round #1, see my previous post <a href="http://www.msunderestimated.com/2006/08/02/mckinney-vs-johnson-round-1-videos/">here</a>. These new rounds, however, are TKOs by the moderators of the debate. I&#8217;m not sure either opponent won this one.</p>

	<p>&#8220;The fact of the matter is&#8230;.&#8221; <em>(watch the videos to understand that oft-used opening to McKinney&#8217;s statements &#8211; it was akin to &#8220;well, you know.. like, it was so, I mean, so, like, you know, we were the evil, like country, like you know?)</em> Can I have a dollar for every time she said that? Aw, shucks&#8230; okay.</p>

	<p>This was <span class="caps">VERY</span> painful to watch. However, it was not only painful, but it was also &#8211; again &#8211; entertaining on cell-slapper Cynthia&#8217;s part. She is the queen of the &#8220;non-answer&#8221; coalition, and her biggest claim to fame in this debate and others, and by her own admission, is that she is the &#8220;#1 biggest critic of the Bush Administration.&#8221; Okay, so that puts you where in your political standing? It makes you no greater or higher in prestige than Pelosi, Dean, Boxer, Reid, Kerry, Kennedy, Murtha, and on and on and on. What? Are you guys all going to get into a fight to determine the <span class="caps">WWF</span> champion of who is <span class="caps">THE</span> biggest Bush critic? I think that can be won by the lunatic left collectively; so, no, Cynthia, you do not deserve a special place at the table of the Democratic party.</p>

	<p>The Georgia Columbus Ledger had an <span class="caps">AP </span><a href="http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/mld/ledgerenquirer/15207414.htm"> piece</a> on today&#8217;s debate:</p>



	<p><blockquote>Johnson says he is not a Republican pawn and he started running his race before the &#8220;ABC&#8221; &#8211; &#8220;Anybody but Cynthia&#8221; &#8211; campaign began. He said that of the more than 1,400 individual contributions his campaign has received, most were donations of $100 or less. Johnson said his campaign has identified only three contributions from known Republicans.</p>

	<p>&#8220;I can guarantee the public my allegiance is to the voters,&#8221; Johnson said.</p>

	<p>The candidates for the 4th Congressional District squared off in a live hour-long debate aired on <span class="caps">WSB</span>-TV. It was the last televised debate before Tuesday&#8217;s runoff election.</p>

	<p>In the July 18th primary, Johnson, an attorney and former DeKalb County Commissioner, came within 1,700 votes of McKinney to force a runoff.</p>

	<p>During the debate, Johnson twice questioned McKinney about the March scuffle between the congresswoman and a Capitol Hill police officer, asking her to tell voters what really happened that day. McKinney said the grand jury had spoken on the issue and vindicated her.</p>

	<p>&#8220;What is a woman to do when she is grabbed from behind?&#8221; McKinney asked. &#8220;The grand jury knows everything about that incident. Mr. Johnson wasn&#8217;t there and he doesn&#8217;t know anything.&#8221;</p>

	<p>Johnson seized upon the Capitol Hill incident as an example of what he has called McKinney&#8217;s embarrassing leadership in office. While he has spent much of his campaign contrasting himself to McKinney&#8217;s outspoken, confrontational style, Johnson says he thinks voters believe he is the best candidate for the job and not just an alternative to the controversial Congresswoman.</p>

	<p><center><img src="http://msunderestimated.com/McKinneyJohnsonSideGlances.jpg" alt="" /></center></p>

	<p>&#8220;I think the &#8216;Anybody But Cynthia&#8217; campaign has turned into the &#8216;We Love Hank&#8217; campaign,&#8221; he quipped.</p>

	<p>McKinney called herself the &#8220;Number One critic of the Bush administration&#8221; and urged voters to send her back to Washington.</p>

	<p>&#8220;I stand in stark contrast to the Republican majority, and I&#8217;m proud of that,&#8221; McKinney said. &#8220;I promise to go to Washington and never be quiet.&#8221;</p>

	<p>When questioned about the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah and the need for an immediate cease-fire, McKinney said that every country has a right to self-defense, but that the U.S. should be doing more to encourage peace in the region and take more of a stand for human rights for Israeli and Lebanese civilians. Johnson said the U.S. should stand by Israel as its ally.</p>

	<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s very difficult to call a cease-fire with a terrorist organization,&#8221; Johnson said.</blockquote></p>

	<p>To read the rest, and to watch the videos, go to MsUnderestimated&#8217;s <a href="http://www.msunderestimated.com/2006/08/06/mckinney-vs-johnson-rounds-2-3-4-5-videos/">original post</a>.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/06/mckinney-vs-johnson-rounds-2-3-4-5-videos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photoshopping The News - Reuters Blows Smoke Up Our&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/06/photoshopping-the-news-reuters-blows-smoke-up-our/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/06/photoshopping-the-news-reuters-blows-smoke-up-our/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 06:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/06/photoshopping-the-news-reuters-blows-smoke-up-our/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	(This is just a small excerpt, cross-posted from RightWinged.com.  Follow this link to read the entire post with many more photos and links to other bloggers tearing this one apart.)

	Once again we have Reuters proving why you CAN&#8217;T TRUST ANYTHING you see in the mainstream media. I&#8217;m not saying that nothing is true, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>(This is just a small excerpt, cross-posted from <a href="http://www.rightwinged.com/2006/08/photoshopping_the_news_reuters.html">RightWinged.com.  Follow this link</a> to read the entire post with many more photos and links to other bloggers tearing this one apart.)</i></p>

	<p>Once again we have Reuters proving why you <span class="caps">CAN</span>&#8217;T <span class="caps">TRUST ANYTHING</span> you see in the mainstream media. I&#8217;m not saying that <i>nothing</i> is true, but the percentage that is seems to shrink by the day.</p>

	<p><img alt="Reuters Photoshop" src="http://www.exposetheleft.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/08/reutersblowssmoke.jpg" /></p>

	<p><a href="http://www.rightwinged.com/2006/08/photoshopping_the_news_reuters.html">Read the rest at RightWinged.com&#8230;</a><br />
<i>(Obviously you could just look at that image and realize how obvious it is that it&#8217;s a photoshop job.  But for the real nitty gritty, plus dirt on this Reuters photographer, be sure to read the entire post)</i></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/06/photoshopping-the-news-reuters-blows-smoke-up-our/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pallywood</title>
		<link>http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/05/pallywood/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/05/pallywood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 22:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/05/pallywood/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	This video is quite revealing how the terrorists use propaganda to sway the sympathetic left in the West.
 ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>This video is quite revealing how the terrorists use <strong><a href="http://stoptheaclu.com/archives/2006/08/05/pallywood/">propaganda to sway the sympathetic left in the West.</a></strong></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/05/pallywood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACLU Applauds No Punishment For Pregnant Women Doing Drugs</title>
		<link>http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/05/aclu-applauds-no-punishment-for-pregnant-women-doing-drugs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/05/aclu-applauds-no-punishment-for-pregnant-women-doing-drugs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 11:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/05/aclu-applauds-no-punishment-for-pregnant-women-doing-drugs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Via ACLU

	&#8220;The ACLU of Maryland is heartened that the high court agrees that prosecuting drug-dependent pregnant women is not what the state of Maryland considers good policy,&#8221; said David Rocah, staff attorney for the ACLU of Maryland. &#8220;We believe that using criminal law to regulate a pregnant woman&#8217;s conduct on the theory that it might [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><a href="http://www.aclu.org/privacy/medical/26389prs20060803.html">Via <span class="caps">ACLU</span></a></p>

	<p><blockquote>&#8220;The <span class="caps">ACLU</span> of Maryland is <strong>heartened </strong>that the high court agrees that prosecuting drug-dependent pregnant women is not what the state of Maryland considers good policy,&#8221; said David Rocah, staff attorney for the <span class="caps">ACLU</span> of Maryland. &#8220;We believe that using criminal law to regulate a pregnant woman&#8217;s conduct on the<strong> theory that it might harm a fetus </strong>or her newborn child is counterproductive, illegal, and, ultimately bad for children and society.&#8221; (emphasis in bold is mine.)</blockquote></p>

	<p><strong><a href="http://stoptheaclu.com/archives/2006/08/05/aclu-applauds-no-punishment-for-pregnant-women-doing-drugs/">Read all about this at Stop The <span class="caps">ACLU</span>.</a></strong></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/05/aclu-applauds-no-punishment-for-pregnant-women-doing-drugs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monday</title>
		<link>http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/04/monday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/04/monday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 17:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/04/monday/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	I&#8217;ll be taking the weekend off, unless breaking news warrants my presence.

	Anyways, I have a big announcement on Monday, stay tuned.
 ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;ll be taking the weekend off, unless breaking news warrants my presence.</p>

	<p>Anyways, I have a big announcement on Monday, stay tuned.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/04/monday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olbermann Begs For O&#8217;Reilly To Say His Name (VIDEO)</title>
		<link>http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/04/olbermann-fiction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/04/olbermann-fiction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 15:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Hate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Lies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Bias]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/04/olbermann-fiction/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	

	Keith Olbermann has officially gone insane. On Thursday night&#8217;s edition of Countdown, he practically begged FOX News host Bill O&#8217;Reilly to say his name on television. Comedian Keith Olbermann did one of those lame &#8220;Factor Fiction&#8221; (emphasis his) segments last night, mocking Bill O&#8217;Reilly and Geraldo Rivera&#8217;s discussion on media &#8220;vampires&#8221;. Vampires, referring to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><center><img src="http://www.exposetheleft.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/08/olbermann-fiction.jpg" /></center></p>

	<p>Keith Olbermann has officially gone insane. On Thursday night&#8217;s edition of <em>Countdown</em>, he practically begged <span class="caps">FOX </span>News host Bill O&#8217;Reilly to say his name on television. Comedian Keith Olbermann did one of those lame &#8220;Fact<strong>or</strong> Fiction&#8221; (emphasis his) segments last night, mocking Bill O&#8217;Reilly and Geraldo Rivera&#8217;s discussion on media &#8220;vampires&#8221;. Vampires, referring to the blood sucking media types like Keith Olbermann! The Olbersphere, a term coined by Robert Cox at <a href="http://www.olbermannwatch.com">Olbermann Watch</a>, weighs in on Olbermann&#8217;s sad attempt to be funny.</p>

	<p><a href="http://www.olbermannwatch.com/archives/2006/08/countdown_with_90.html">Olbermann Watch</a>:</p>

	<p><blockquote>The infamous, deplorable Keith Olbermann launched into another of his famous &#8220;dramatic readings&#8221; of the transcript, interspersing snarky, too-hip-for-my-shirt asides that had The Laughing Stagehand in convulsions. Then all of a sudden, it was over. It just stopped. Color us disappointed. Where was the &#8220;fiction&#8221; Olby promised to expose? What were the &#8220;lies&#8221; that Mr Bill spoke? Um, well, you see, there weren&#8217;t any. Those two promises from The Schmuck were&#8212;all together now&#8212;more Olbermann lies.</blockquote></p>

	<p><a href="http://newsbusters.org/node/6752">Greg Sheffield at Newsbusters quips</a>:</p>

	<p><blockquote>On last night&#8217;s &#8220;Countdown,&#8221; Keith Olbermann wondered why he still hasn&#8217;t gotten Bill O&#8217;Reilly to mention his name.</blockquote></p>

	<p>The <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/msnbc/olbermann_to_oreilly_how_much_worse_could_you_make_it_by_using_my_name_41415.asp?c=rss">usually sycophantic TVNewser</a> actually reports about the incident for once, without any of his pro-Keith rhetoric.</p>

	<p><a href="http://www.video.exposetheleft.net/video/olbermann-fiction.wmv"><span class="caps">VIDEO</span></a> &#8211; .WMV<br />
<a href="http://www.video.exposetheleft.net/video/olbermann-fiction.mov"><span class="caps">VIDEO</span></a> &#8211; .MOV</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exposetheleft.com/2006/08/04/olbermann-fiction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<enclosure url="http://www.video.exposetheleft.net/video/olbermann-fiction.mov" length="10181028" type="video/quicktime" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
