1. 1
   BorgQueen Said:
   5:27 pm  [ Quote ]
   

   “abortion record?”

2. 2
   Moe's Woes Trackbacked With:
   10:24 pm  [ Quote ]
   

   A Twofer For Ya

   For some reason, I missed seeing Michelle Malkin on Fox and Friends this morning, even though I was awake the entire time and had Fox News on. Go figure. It also kinda didn’t help that for the first time I can recall, she didn’t mention it on her blo…

3. 3
   GrtflMark Said:
   11:58 pm  [ Quote ]
   

   I love Micelle Malkin she is always right on. I also want to say something about the despicable and heinous behavior of Chris Matthews who put on the parents of a young Marine just killed in Iraq and started a conversation – not about their son and how loving and wonderful he was – but asking them “what is wrong with this war in Iraq?” and “What has Bush done wrong” and “What would you tell Bush if you could talk to him right now?”

   .....It is without question – the WORST thing I have ever seen. It is sickening.

4. 4
   J. Bryant Said:
   4:27 pm  [ Quote ]
   

   First time I’m at your blog. So sorry not more thought is going into it – you don’t seem to actually be interested in politics – just more right wing blinders.
   1) I don’t think the NY Times should be “going after” adoption records but…from what the Drudge report says, the NY Times was doing a background check which does seem logical. I think this is jumping the gun here (and I notice a lot of right wing blogs seem to have leapt on it so congrats for running with the pack.)
   2) I don’t know Bob Beckel – interesting that he is a loon. I’ll google him at some point. Seems like being a liberal on Fox News is a pretty thankless job and I’m amazed anyone wants to do it. Do you also have a label for Michelle and her un-American ideas of Japanese internment being a good thing? (Did I get that wrong – please feel free to explain her point of view.)
   3) Since you closed the comments on Chris Matthews, I thought I would write something here. I think it was quite ghoulish to have such obviously distraught parents on – as I think it always is when TV exploits personal tragedy. (You wouldn’t have any examples of that on your site, right? No Schiavo, others of that sort, right? I haven’t looked around.) What I am interested in is how they ended up on Hardball. Did Hardball contact all the parents to see who wanted to be on and was this the planned topic? I do think these parents thought this was the best thing they could do to honor their son – it was an opportunity to get their voice heard and it looks like they wanted to take that rare opportunity. (BTW – since when is Chris Matthews a liberal? Liberals don’t vote for Bush.)

5. 5
   Kevin Said:
   5:28 pm  [ Quote ]
   

   regarding post #4, the only person here with blinders on is the one who thinks doing bakground checks on adopted children is ‘logical’. If you can’t see that the NYT is desperately searching for any reason whatsoever to dislike Roberts, then you are doomed to live your life out believing their hateful, hurtful rhetoric.

   It makes me sad, because by believing the drivel printed at NYT, one cannot help but think the USA is a bad place full of evil republicans who enjoy wars, want to steal (oil or something else) from other countries, and try to make poor people suffer. I don’t know any republicans who feel this way, but the NYT obviously does.

6. 6
   J. Bryant Said:
   12:15 pm  [ Quote ]
   

   Actually, I don’t know any Republicans who feel that way either….but, we aren’t being led by any real Republicans anymore. We have a new political animal in office now who breaks almost every conservative rule….

   By the way – I used to do PR (now I do marketing and you are obviously a dream demographic) When journalists wanted to write about my clients, they wanted as much a background as possible – and I knew that. What they did with that information is something else.

   Interesting that you don’t believe the “drivel” printed at NYT but do believe the Drudge Report. I know – the BBC, Bill Moyers, Walter Cronkite—- all nothing compared to Drudge.

7. 7
   Mike Holland Said:
   11:23 am  [ Quote ]
   

   I urge caution when accepting someone’s credentials as “conservative” just because a TV commentator refers to him or her as such. For example, Michelle Malkin was positioned as a “conservative” with her much-touted book on illegal immigration. But then she spews nothing but blatantly racist comments about Arabs, and gives unqualified support to the (undeclared) war on Iraq. This is decidedly NOT a conservative position on several counts: 1) the President does not have the authority to wage war without a DECLARATION by Congress. This is a violation of the law that We the People require our govenment employees follow. 2) Launching a “pre-emptive war” is unprecedented in American history, and, as we all know now, was based on manufactured data (read lies). 3) One cannot be “pro-life” while dropping cluster bombs on helpless civilians.

   Don’t accept other peoples’ labels for advocates like Malkin. Examine their statements and the ramifications of their positions. Measure that against your Bible and the Constitution to decide if they are truly Conservative.

   Mike Holland, M.D.
   Arizona Republican Assembly

8. 8
   Bob Smith Said:
   12:20 pm  [ Quote ]
   

   Thanks Dr. Holland for some ‘uncommon’ sense.

9. 9
   The Blue Bus is calling us... Trackbacked With:
   11:13 am  [ Quote ]
   

   Malkin vs. Malkin

   If you still had any doubt about Michelle Malkin’s hackery, check this out. Beautiful. In order to help the debate over Cindy Sheehan to move forward, I’ve agreed to moderate a debate between right-wing hack Michelle Malkin and conservative apologist…

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

You must be logged in to post a comment.